EatSlow: Visual Pace Tracker
Company name | Product name | Pros | Cons | Starting price | Product similarity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
20-minute eating | 20-minute eating |
|
| — | 90.0% |
mindful bite | mindful bite |
|
| — | 90.0% |
noom | noom |
|
| — | 90.0% |
calm | calm |
|
| — | 80.0% |
eat, chew rest | eat, chew rest |
|
| — | 80.0% |
headspace | headspace |
|
| Free tier available | 80.0% |
michelle may | am i hungry? virtual coach |
|
| — | 80.0% |
mindful meal timer | mindful meal timer |
|
| Free tier available | 80.0% |
myfitnesspal | myfitnesspal |
|
| Free tier available | 80.0% |
susan albers | eat drink and be mindful |
|
| — | 80.0% |
erakulis (cristiano ronaldo) | erakulis |
|
| — | 70.0% |
feeling great | feeling great |
|
| — | 70.0% |
20-minute eating
20-minute eating
Pros
- Structured 20-minute eating framework
- Audio and haptic feedback
- Customizable intervals
Cons
- Fixed 20-minute timeframe
- May not adapt to different meal types
- Limited visual feedback
Starting price: —
Similarity: 90.0%
mindful bite
mindful bite
Pros
- Direct focus on eating speed
- Simple pacing mechanism
- Hunger/fullness awareness
Cons
- Limited customization options
- Basic visual feedback
- May not track progress over time
Starting price: —
Similarity: 90.0%
noom
noom
Pros
- Psychology-based approach to behavior change
- Comprehensive weight loss solution
- Personalized coaching
Cons
- Higher cost compared to basic tracking apps
- Requires significant user commitment
- May be overwhelming for casual users
Starting price: —
Similarity: 90.0%
calm
calm
Pros
- Strong funding history (USD 218 million in 2020)
- Established market presence
- Focus on mental wellness
Cons
- Limited to meditation and mindfulness
- No direct eating or pace tracking features
Starting price: —
Similarity: 80.0%
eat, chew rest
eat, chew rest
Pros
- Unique traffic light visual system
- Step-by-step eating guidance
- Incorporates mindfulness and gratitude
Cons
- May feel rigid or mechanical
- Limited customization
- Fixed three-step process
Starting price: —
Similarity: 80.0%
headspace
headspace
Pros
- Well-established brand in meditation space
- Comprehensive content library
- User-friendly interface with animations
Cons
- Limited free content
- Relatively high subscription cost
- Focuses primarily on meditation rather than comprehensive wellness
Starting price: Free tier available
Similarity: 80.0%
michelle may
am i hungry? virtual coach
Pros
- Structured decision-making process
- Based on established mindful eating methodology
- Focuses on awareness before eating
Cons
- May not provide real-time eating pace feedback
- Limited to pre-eating decisions
Starting price: —
Similarity: 80.0%
mindful meal timer
mindful meal timer
Pros
- Simple and focused approach
- Separate timers for meals and snacks
- Android availability
Cons
- Limited to Android platform
- Basic functionality
- No visual pace feedback
Starting price: Free tier available
Similarity: 80.0%
myfitnesspal
myfitnesspal
Pros
- Large food database
- Popular and established brand
- Comprehensive tracking capabilities
Cons
- May not focus specifically on eating pace
- General fitness app rather than specialized eating behavior
Starting price: Free tier available
Similarity: 80.0%
susan albers
eat drink and be mindful
Pros
- Comprehensive hunger and emotion tracking
- Mind-body awareness focus
- Built-in reminders
Cons
- May not focus specifically on eating speed
- Could feel like food diary tracking
Starting price: —
Similarity: 80.0%
erakulis (cristiano ronaldo)
erakulis
Pros
- Celebrity endorsement and backing
- Comprehensive wellness approach
- Professional consultation access
Cons
- New market entrant with unproven track record
- Limited specific information about features
Starting price: —
Similarity: 70.0%
feeling great
feeling great
Pros
- AI-powered technology
- Recent significant funding (USD 8 million seed funding)
- Global expansion focus
Cons
- Early stage company
- Limited information about specific features
- Focus primarily on mental health rather than eating habits
Starting price: —
Similarity: 70.0%